HOA Put 60 Solar Panels on My Land — Then the Utility Asked, “Who Authorized This?”
Chapter 18
Theme:
Font Size:
24px
I read that email three times. From Vanessa's point of view, the choices were clear: place panels on HOA land where her street would see them, or place them on pasture that somebody else owned, where the slope would hide much of the installation. The future amenity would remain possible on the common tract. The array would deliver its benefits from the ranch side of the boundary, and most residents would never know what had been traded away to improve the view.Another email made the sequence even clearer. Ryan had requested confirmation of site-control authority for the revised location before releasing the final construction drawings. His message was professional and unremarkable, the kind of question somebody might overlook because it arrived among dozens of routine project details. It asked the client to confirm that the new site could legally be used for the installation.Vanessa had answered, "Board approval remains in effect. Proceed with revised location."Those words were not a deed, a lease, a recorded easement, or a consent form from me. They did not explain why moving a line downhill would preserve the authority of a vote taken for a different footprint. But they were simple, decisive, and convenient. A project manager facing a schedule had received a message from the person authorized to speak for his client saying the approval remained effective. The next steps had followed.I called Ryan and asked him about the original location. He confirmed that the uphill design had been considered technically feasible. The main issues had been aesthetics and the association's plans for that common area. When I asked whether the HOA had specifically requested the downhill option, he said yes. He did not volunteer a judgment about whether that request was wise or lawful."Did anybody update the utility's site map after the location changed?" I asked."It should have gone through final coordination," he said."That's not the same as saying it did.""No," he admitted. "I'm reviewing that now."Twenty minutes later he called back and told me he could not locate a separate landowner authorization attached to the revised site approval. He had found board confirmation of the change, but no evidence that the revised location had been reconciled with the interconnection application before construction proceeded. His voice sounded tired. He was beginning to understand that the orderly paperwork he had inherited concealed a disorderly relationship among three different parcels, two drawings, and one person who owned the place where the equipment stood."I should have insisted on the updated information before release," he said."It wouldn't have taken long to ask me," I replied."No. It wouldn't."I did not need Ryan to abase himself for me to believe he meant it. I wanted him to identify what had gone wrong in the process so that it would not happen again. He had not moved the location because he disliked my cattle. He had relied on a client's representation and failed to notice that the representation no longer matched the ground. That was a mistake, and it had consequences, but it was not the same mistake Vanessa had made when she chose the location.