Two Cops Took $1,000 From a Retired Man on I-70 — Then He Made One Phone Call

Chapter 3

Theme:
Font Size:
24px

Vardon’s initial approach was captured clearly.

The supposed following-too-closely violation was not.

The dash camera showed enough of the road before the stop to make the basis questionable but not impossible; camera perspective could distort distance.

More important was audio.

Vardon never said he smelled marijuana until after noticing the retired credential.

Then the search.

Then the cash.

Then the line about “pending narcotics review.”

Then the badge tossed onto the shoulder.

Price watched twice.

When Elias asked what she thought, she answered, “I don't tell witnesses what I think.”

He smiled.

“Good.”

The investigation could have ended with one theft case.

Instead Naomi Price asked a broader question.

Had anyone else complained?

Ashford County’s citizen-complaint database showed six allegations against Vardon involving missing or disputed cash during traffic stops over four years.

Three had been closed as unsubstantiated.

One complainant had a drug conviction and was considered unreliable.

Another never returned calls.

A third claimed two hundred eighty dollars disappeared during a vehicle search but had no receipt proving the money existed.

Individually, weak cases.

Price requested the original files.

A pattern emerged.

All six stops occurred on Interstate 70.

All involved out-of-county or out-of-state motorists.

Four included an alleged marijuana odor.

Five involved consent disputes.

Three body cameras began late.

Two had brief unexplained interruptions.

No seized cash appeared in official property records.

Price then compared the unit GPS histories.

That produced something worse.

Unit 214 had made numerous roadside stops that never appeared in CAD as enforcement activity.

Some could be ordinary—assisting motorists, breaks, paperwork.

Others lasted fifteen to thirty minutes on interstate shoulders.

Price requested automated license-plate reader data from highway cameras and paired it with unit GPS.

Now she had vehicle plates.

She began calling owners.

Most conversations went nowhere.

Then a truck driver from Kentucky answered.

“Was I stopped by Ashford County two years ago?”

“Yes.”

“Why?”

“Money.”

Price asked him to explain.

The driver said two deputies had searched his truck after claiming they smelled marijuana. They found no drugs but took six hundred dollars he carried for fuel and road expenses. The older deputy told him it was being seized because “drug couriers use cash.” The driver asked for paperwork and was told it would come by mail.

It never did.

“Why didn't you complain?”

“I did.”

“What happened?”

“Sergeant called me a month later and said they had no record of taking it.”

“Who was the deputy?”

The driver paused.

“Vardon.”

The second officer?

“Kessler, maybe. Young guy.”

Price found the complaint.

Closed.

Unable to corroborate property seizure.

No body-camera file remained because retention policy at the time automatically deleted non-evidentiary recordings after a set period.

The next witness was an elderly woman from Missouri.

Three hundred dollars missing after a search.

News in the same category

Two Cops Took $1,000 From a Retired Man on I-70 — Then He Made One Phone Call

10 Part